Primary tabs
Urantiana
"Professor Roger Penrose from Oxford University says concentric circles discovered in the background microwaves of the universe … adds evidence to the theory that the universe has expanded ('the Big Bang') and contracted ('the Big Crunch') many times. … The research appears to cast aside the widely-held 'inflationary' theory of the origins of the universe, that it began with the Big Bang, and will continue to expand until a point in the future, when it will end. …
"They say that this means that … the universe cycles through aeons dominated by big bangs and supermassive black hole collisions. Professor Penrose believes that his new theory of ‘conformal cyclic cosmology' means that black holes will eventually consume all the matter in the universe. According to his theory, when they have finished, all that will be left in the universe will be energy - which will then trigger the next Big Bang - and the new aeon."
How cheery! It's still The Big Bang + Big Crunch Theory, now it's just The Big Bang Theory in infinite re-runs.*
(I remember a late-night session at college in the early 1970s, possibly not even a chemically assisted session, where a housemate of mine [waving at Charlie] and I worked out that this could be a likely scenario. Didn't realize we were so ahead of our time.)
A Urantia Papers student might ask, might these rings also suggest a cosmic substantiation of "space respiration"? (In fact, it was a comment by "FizViz, Brighton UK," conjecturing just this possible association, which brought this to my attention.)
The cycles of space respiration extend in each phase for a little more than one billion Urantia years. During one phase the universes expand; during the next they contract. Pervaded space is now approaching the mid-point of the expanding phase…. For a billion years of Urantia time the space reservoirs contract while the master universe and the force activities of all horizontal space expand. It thus requires a little over two billion Urantia years to complete the entire expansion-contraction cycle.
Your own local creation (Nebadon) participates in this movement of universal outward expansion. The entire seven superuniverses participate in the two-billion-year cycles of space respiration along with the outer regions of the master universe. … When the universes expand and contract, the material masses in pervaded space alternately move against and with the pull of Paradise gravity.
The Mail article notes that the universe's age is estimated to be 13.7 billion years, "and they have discovered 12 examples of concentric circles, some of which have five rings - which means the same object has had five massive events in its history." I'm not sure that calculation was comprehensibly stated, but if five events were evenly divided into 13.7 billion years, that's about 2.75 billion years per cycle. Pretty close, considering with all the variables there's a galaxy-wide margin of error.
Below the article, comments include this from one "Robert Tobin, Australia":
"Good bye 'God,' hello sense and logic and above all SCIENCE. … It was SCIENCE that made me Atheist even before I realised how stupid and illogical Religion is and how it spreads the Poison of the GOD VIRUS. THERE IS NO GOD, SO STOP WORRYING."
When I see this kind of remark, I usually think: "You know that the God you don't believe in? I wouldn't believe in him either." There is no logic in his anti-religious raving, no reasoning which draws a line between this scientific report and whatever problem he has with the concept of Deity. His remark sparked some responses, but I thought I would just contrast it here with this:
"Of the vast body of knowledge concerning the superuniverses, I can hope to tell you little, but there is operative throughout these realms a technique of intelligent control for both physical and spiritual forces, and the universal gravity presences there function in majestic power and perfect harmony."
—A Universal Censor, P15 §0 ¶3
So, yeah, stop worrying. He got that right.
First People in the Americas
Anthropology & The Urantia Book on hominid evolution
Humanity's Lemur-Like Asian Ancestry
The tomb of St. Philip the Apostle, one of the original 12 disciples of Christianity's central figure Jesus Christ, has been discovered during the ongoing excavations in Turkey's south-western province of Denizli.
Italian professor Francesco D'Andria, the head of the excavation team at the Hierapolis ancient city in Denizli, told reporters on Tuesday that experts had reached the tomb of St. Philip whose name is mentioned in the Bible as one of the 12 Apostles of Jesus.
Professor D'Andria said archeologists had been working for years to find the tomb of the Biblical figure, and finally, they had managed to reach the monument while working on the ruins of a newly-unearthed church in Hierapolis.
D'Andria said the structure of the tomb and the writings on it proved that it belonged to St. Philip the Apostle, who is recognized as a martyr in the history of Christianity.
Philip went on through the trying times of the Master’s death, participated in the reorganization of the twelve, and was the first to go forth to win souls for the kingdom outside of the immediate Jewish ranks, being most successful in his work for the Samaritans and in all his subsequent labors in behalf of the gospel.
Philip’s wife, who was an efficient member of the women’s corps, became actively associated with her husband in his evangelistic work after their flight from the Jerusalem persecutions. His wife was a fearless woman. She stood at the foot of Philip’s cross encouraging him to proclaim the glad tidings even to his murderers, and when his strength failed, she began the recital of the story of salvation by faith in Jesus and was silenced only when the irate Jews rushed upon her and stoned her to death. Their eldest daughter, Leah, continued their work, later on becoming the renowned prophetess of Hierapolis.
Philip, the onetime steward of the twelve, was a mighty man in the kingdom, winning souls wherever he went; and he was finally crucified for his faith and buried at Hierapolis.
Through the influence of the Christian apostle Paul, a church was founded here while he was at Ephesus.[3] The Christian apostle Philip spent the last years of his life here.[4] In 80 CE, he was martyred by crucifixion and was buried here. His daughters remained active as prophetesses in the region.[citation needed] The Martyrium was built on the spot where Philip was crucified.
What's yawn-inducing or a head-scratcher to one person will be the Big Enlightenment to somebody else.
Lucretius said, quod ali cibus est aliis fuat acre venenum!
As with reading the revelation. What's yawn-inducing or a head-scratcher to one person will be the Big Enlightenment to somebody else.
I sometimes think how, say, the deeper science passages in The Urantia Book would be so fascinating to those who might be well-versed in astronomy or physics but who are still looking for those scientific missing links that only revelation could supply. I'm not enough of a scientist to get that much.
Reading two weeks ago about the God concept among the Hebrews, Chris and I were both wishing we had better knowledge of history of Biblical times, but I'm sure some well-versed in history have appreciated the revelation's revelation of what really happened.
For some, the whole idea of the absonite might seem like gobbledygook, might be just as incomprehensible as twenty-seven point string theory is to me, but the way the Ultimate tied together the Supreme and Absolute was just what I needed theologically when I first started reading the UB.
That's where group study can be so helpful, getting to see other folks' perspectives on the various passages.
It was a little different than the average Christmas lawn display
Of all the many excellent revelations I've derived from the fifth epochal revelation, one stands out glaringly for me, from The Birth of Jesus.
I mean, I figured out as a little kid the physics of "following the star" were impossible.
And I knew that he wasn't really born in a medieval European style shed.
And I knew that Christ-mass was just the church's way of co-opting the Roman orgy of Saturnalia, and wasn't ever claimed or supposed to be the day Jesus was born.
And I knew that he likely wasn't born 1 AD.
Link corrected 2018 Dec 24
And I had come to understand already that the innkeeper was historically inappropriately maligned — it was never his fault that Joseph didn't check with Travelocity beforehand — but the Urantia revelation added to my understanding of the innkeeper's exoneration. Now we can appreciate the innkeeper's business savvy, having the stables all cleaned up and converted to quarters for rent to the taxpaying crowds when they flooded into town, an event which, of course, had been well-advertised beforehand.
It was not that big a revelation to know there were no shepherds, wise men, Santa Claus, or Frosty the Snowman kneeling at the newborn's creche, as you see in lawn displays around Christmastime. (Even the Gospels make it clear the three wise guys didn't show up until some time later.)
No, the most impressive addition to my understanding was that simple line, "with the help and kind ministrations of women fellow travelers."
It wasn't just the pair of them, all alone in some filthy barn in the middle of nowhere.
There were fellow travelers because they were right by a crowded inn! The inn was booked because the crowds came there to pay taxes for the same reason Joseph and Mary were there! People today might not realize how the stables would be "in town" like a parking garage would be nearby a hotel.
And it wasn't like some places today, people looking down their noses and ignoring the obviously quite-pregnant poor woman as she went into labor. Of course the women helped out, as women would! It was probably more likely they said, "Joseph! You go stand around with the menfolk. Fetch some water. Or towels. Just get out of the way!"
I've wondered whether this revelation of "women fellow travelers" was something that anyone had ever thought of. Has any Urantia revelation student, such as source-researcher Matthew Block, run across some such reference, I wonder? I mean, it's so glaringly obvious once you are told about it, did that idea really never occur to any mortal before the Urantia papers? We needed a super-human revelation to help us figure this out? Revelation? Mega-Duh with a V-8™ forehead slap!
With God all things are not necessarily going to happen, but are possible.
All that is necessary to break the spell of inertia and frustration is this: Act as if it were impossible to fail. That is the talisman, the formula, the command of right-about-face which turns us from failure towards success. --Dorothea Brande (1893-1948)
P.291 - §3 (26:5.3) That, then, is the primary or elementary course which confronts the faith-tested and much-traveled pilgrims of space. But long before reaching Havona, these ascendant children of time have learned to feast upon uncertainty, to fatten upon disappointment, to enthuse over apparent defeat, to invigorate in the presence of difficulties, to exhibit indomitable courage in the face of immensity, and to exercise unconquerable faith when confronted with the challenge of the inexplicable. Long since, the battle cry of these pilgrims became: "In liaison with God, nothing — absolutely nothing — is impossible."
P.555 - §3 (48:6.24) If you fail, will you rise indomitably to try anew? If you succeed, will you maintain a well-balanced poise--a stabilized and spiritualized attitude--throughout every effort in the long struggle to break the fetters of material inertia, to attain the freedom of spirit existence?
My dear old friend Tom has for several years been posting pairings of quotes from mortals with quotes from the Urantia Papers.
Tom's Compares at the Urantia Book Society of Oklahoma
Act as if it were impossible to fail.
Tom has probably done more "compares" with those quotes "feast upon uncertainty" and "rise indomitably" than any other, or else I'm just more aware of them. A quick search of my "Compare" log (which goes back further than the online collection) shows he has used the "feast upon uncertainty" quote 15 times and "rise indomitably" 16 times. He has often paired them as above.
In 1995, I published UB Comix issue #6 on "Success and Achievement." One of the weakest issues, I always thought. I was trying to do the comix on a schedule at that time. I don't generally work well under a forced deadline, and I thought it looked forced. As the center page of that issue portrays. Always liked the back page, though.
Anyway, I often toyed with the idea of doing a second issue on that important subject. For research purposes on the subject. Or an article. Or something. I've copied several relevant "Compares" into a separate folder. The folder keeps growing. Here are some of Tom's Compare quotes from that folder:
"One of the secrets of life is to make stepping stones out of stumbling blocks." --Jack Penn (1909-1996)
"The key is to have a dream that inspires us to go beyond our limits." --Robert Kriegel (motivational speaker)
I like this one:
"How can they say my life is not a success? Have I not for more than sixty years got enough to eat and escaped being eaten?" --Logan Pearsall Smith, essayist (1865-1946)
I'm currently into two books, a chapter in one and the whole subject of another is on the same theme of pushing one's boundaries, not succumbing to failure, and all that. I've heard this kind of motivational stimulus all my life, in and out of the UB, and yet, I've not really known what the UB in one place refers to as "the sweetness of goal attainment," more than very limitedly and very transiently. My fascination with success and achievement may therefore be somewhat comparable to a paraplegic studying great athletes or mountain climbers — a fascination with that which seems ever beyond my grasp.
Similarly, there's the exhortation to proceed "by decisions, by more decisions, and by more decisions." It's rightly been said, not to decide is to decide. Or, another way of saying it, if you don't decide, things will be decided for you. I haven't always been all that dynamic in marching toward choosing and deciding situations, but choices and decisions aplenty have been thrust upon me; I'd like to think I face decisions rather than run from them. I do my best to choose wisely. But best isn't always good enough, in the mortal sphere.
The fruits of my choosing have been pretty consistently rotten. There ought to be some taste of success somewhere in there. I've not got a lot of emotional energy to be depressed because I'm busy being so surprised at how consistently failure marks all my efforts. Since I try big things, naturally I have big failures with big consequences. I'd gladly rise indomitably and all that if it weren't that every time I rise I get smacked down harder, and it makes me wonder if I'm not trying things in all the wrong ways. Too much like Einstein's definition of insanity.
It's one thing to push the envelope in a worthy purpose, win or lose, and it's another to just be nuts. I'm afraid my choices fall more toward the nuts end than the wise. I don't hear the "still small voice whispering 'this is the way,'" so I guess and tend to guess badly. (This is why I don't gamble.) It may be true that "wise planning [is]... the one thing essential to worldly prosperity" (Rodan of Alexandria), but if "The best-laid schemes o' mice an' men gang aft agley, an' lea'e us nought but grief an' pain, for promis'd joy" (To a Mouse, on Turning Her Up in Her Nest with the Plough, by Robert Burns,) how much more true of the less-well-laid plans! When I think I've made plans, it often turns out I was just proceeding in a kind of hopeful pipe-dream.
For each argument that might be made, "Yeah, Don, but you [good thing]," I have seen too harshly the harsh negative consequences. And oddly enough, considering this is what I see, I'm really more optimistic than otherwise. That may be part of the reason why I don't plan well enough for the eventualities of failure, even though they are far more frequent than success.
A relative, not a Urantia Book fan, has sought after more-or-less bogus gurus and been into astrology and yoga, but he was nonetheless always an inspiration to me for seeking spiritual truth. So it was sad, in a way, to hear him tell me once that he himself was disheartened when he looked in an astrological tome about the influence of Pluto on his natal chart and it said, "This person will seek for the golden thread which runs through all the world's religions." It was not like he thought this was a good thing. It's not like there really was such a golden thread, or that there was truth, or that his seeking it was a good thing. It was disappointing because it was merely "in his stars." Like the color of your hair or eyes is in your genes, it doesn't really mean anything. I feel somewhat the same when I read about the influence of birth order. Fourth-borns like me "may have huge plans that never work out" and are "financially irresponsible.". Big plans that never work out and a lack of financial responsibility which would make "wise planning" possible. It's just in my stars and genes. That's not real inspiring.
So, I don't even feel like, as Rodan put it, "each life failure yielded the culture of wisdom and spirit achievement." Maybe I'm just too dense to benefit, but sometimes it seems a fail is just a fail.
But when I set out to live a life of loving service, believing that the will of God can be done in any earthly occupation, and find that my occupations seem all ultimately to be of great disservice and in fact end up undermining that very ability to proceed through which service is possible, as well as wrecking those fundamentals of home and family, I have to wonder, is it live or is it Memorex, or I mean, is it just that I'm the bumbling fool (in a universe of infinite possibilities, somebody gets to be) or is God up to something greater, down the line. Which seems to keep being down the line. Further down the line all the time, in fact. By Occam's razor, bumbling fool seems the more likely possibility. Whenever I encounter that old bromide, "God doesn't make junk," I cringe at the naivete. Nice words aren't always true. But, I suppose, I can't help but "act as if it were impossible to fail," anyway.
Topical studies at TruthBook.com (Urantia related site):on Success and Failure, Defeat
Prayers for Success & Breakthroughs In Business at Mountain of Fire
"The secret of happiness is not doing what one likes to do but in liking what one has to do." -Sai Baba






