Primary tabs
Posts
not including Doodles
Hollywood Reporter Headline: "Tilda Swinton is in talks to play the Ancient One in Scott Derrickson's Doctor Strange"
For those poor folks who don't know about the comic characters spawned by Steve Ditko, who also created Spider-Man, here's the background: The Ancient One in comics was an ancient Tibetan-styled reclusive monk who was the mentor of Doctor Strange. For those like me who don't keep up with modern Hollyweird, "Tilda" is apparently female.
This caused the Hollywood Reporter's Graeme McMillan to gush, "Marvel appears to be finally making a welcome step in a direction that other comic book movies have been moving in for some time." Swapping a woman out for a man. Graeme thinks it's long overdue to eliminate more longstanding white male role models. Because, diversity.
I don't know Tilda. The accompanying photo shows someone who seems appropriately ethereal and could with makeup make a great old weirdo mystic. By the way, it's not until the comments that I read "So this article is POC trash instead of talking about they got a oscar winner in a lead role." Fine reporting there, Graeme,
I almost left a comment on the article. I wrote it up. Then I saved it to a file instead. When I thought about the blowback I might get from social justice warriors who might be irritated by my comments, I thought, in the immortal words of Sweet Brown, ain't nobody got time f'r that.
The article was repeated by Jay Jayson at ComicBook.com. I was tempted to leave my comment there, among readers more comic-book aware and maybe less left-leaning on the whole.
Instead, I'm posting my unposted comment right here (with amendations and links, and re-edited shortly after publication, because I can):
Hello, Hollywood. I know you won't believe this, but out here in the Real World, this push for "diversity" seems to have mutated (and not in an X-Men way) into a serious mental disease, one in which people attempt to bend media to inappropriately reflect some minorities as far more prevalent than they really are, and eliminate perceived unfair "majority" figures.
It's really too bad Hollywood has to do-over the Big Company superheroes when there are comic-books, and superdupers, about and by ethnics, that deserve to see the big screen, but alas they're not guaranteed-success Marvel-DC properties.
Trans-racializing has been going on aplenty. Black "James" (don't call me Jimmy) Olson has already appeared in the new ("bootlegged") Supergirl pilot, Black Nick Fury is of course in all the modern movies, but I think they did that in the comics before the movies. In the current Flash TV series, Flash's future wife, Iris West, and her father, are black — and besides that, semi-orphaned Flash-Barry was raised in their house, so the Iris-Barry relationship is as uncomfortably incestuous as step-siblings can be; extra special "diversity". There are surely even more superheroes affected by revisionist revitiligo, as The Boondocks' Uncle Ruckus might put it. (Noting especially that none of these blacks sound or act "black" anywhere near as much as gangsters on Gotham sound Italian, at least we don't need Ghetto-English subtitles.) If this trend increases, ABC will have to merge with BET. Oh, c'mon. That was funny. Maybe you have to be White.
Okay, but that's merely race-swapping. We need more gender-swapping, right? Right? Amirite? Amirite?
Weirdest thing about diversity for diversity's sake is, people you meet who are brown, red, yellow, Jewish, Mormon, male or female — they are whatever they are and where they are for real reasons. One might cast a black man as Romeo on-stage, where there's a different level of suspension of disbelief than with a screen portrayal; it's simply not historically sensible for a serious historic portrayal of 16th-Century Verona. This current pattern of substitution based on race or gender is done without any sense of such background. For advancing awareness, it's not per se so very harmful. Play with themes. Create alternate universes. It is seamless sometimes. Other times, it's just painfully obvious someone said, "Hey, we need an ethnic here!" or "Can we make Testosterone Guy into a Woman, just because, Diversity!"
It's true non-Europeans were under-represented in comic books for a long time, as superpowered women were also relatively few, but why does every damn movie-ized role have to include a flaming transgender of color? Yes, for emphasis I exaggerate, but, really, we've gone 'way past reasonable "inclusion," and deeply into "in-your-face" overloading. It is especially jarring to see a former brother and sister be of two different races in the new Fantastic Four. There will be some explanation, but who cares? It was obviously just done "because diversity." I think that actually cheapens the whole purpose; I'm offended by this triggering microaggression, for the sake of women and ethnics.
Why not make the brilliant Reed Richards a Korean? Because that's not PC in the right way. T'challa "The Black Panther," Kirby's great first black superhero, King of Wakanda, will not be made over into a white African, I'll bet. Why not, in the name of random "diversity"? Will the Ancient One even still be Tibetan? "Free Tibet" is still PC, right?
Commenter DBZ *King Goku* put it all more succinctly than I have. :D
Whoops! Excuse me for speaking. Being a male-identifying Anglo-Saxon Protestant conservative, nothing I have to say is of any value. Carry on.
• Salon.com Wants Marvel Comics To Change The Race Of A Jewish Character Because - DIVERSITY! -Miss CJ, Chicks on the Right
• Marvel comics rebooting ENTIRE universe with more diverse Muslim, black and female superheroes by soopermexican at Right Scoop
Hillary's vibrant and intriguing new campaign logo did not go unnoticed by the wizards of the web!

Additional efforts (2015 Apr 14)
Branding: It can work both ways c/o Liberal Logic 101
DOH! dapenguin c/o BFH IOTW Report
Preparation H by Dianny at Patriot Retort
and many more at
Internet Reacts to Logo by Kemberlee Kaye at Legal Insurrection
April 5, Western Easter Sunday, 2015 A.D.
"Read The Bible That's my exhortation to everyone this Easter Sunday. Even if you're not a believer, I think it's important for an educated, informed adult, even nowadays, to have at least a passing familiarity with its contents. …"
I might say, if that's too tall an order to start with, at least read the Gospels.
Many influences, including books ranging from The Passover Plot to Be Here Now, led me to, finally, in my early 20s, during a break from college, sit down in my mother's back yard with the mostly-untouched Bible mom had given me for my mostly meaningless Episccopal "Confirmation," and for the first time read for myself the four Gospels.
I came away thinking, for one thing, "Oh! Now I see what all the excitement is about." For another thing, a feeling something like, "Why hadn't anybody told me about this?" Which is funny, what with my mother taking me to church every Sunday, and growing up in the buckle of the Bible Belt.
Further, by nothing but these ancient, disparate reports, I was convinced of the veracity of Jesus' having lived, died, and risen; that much (not necessarily all) of the miracles happened and the teachings were his; and especially that he said and meant his claims to having lived before and having all power, in short, being the Son of God — it's why they killed him, after all.
I saw the equation that confronted me. If I took all that to be valid as reported, then, either he was just a nice teacher with a messiah complex, or he was telling the truth. As fantastical and science-fictiony as that seems, it really was a no-brainer. Even in the muddied and sometimes conflicting re-tellings by his followers' followers, he was brilliant, impressive, unique in character and solid in his understanding. He was the opposite of insanity.
That left me puzzling, though, what it really meant.
I was "reborn," but I didn't run to the Baptist tabernacle to swear to familiar Fundamentalist Christian explanations, any more than I cared about the attempts of Matthew to convince Jews that Jesus was fulfilling supposed Jewish Messianic prophecy. Seemed to me like there was an explanation not quite made explicit by Jesus.
Jesus went behind the scenes, leaving his followers to their Acts and post-Jesus sequels. In the Epistles, in Apocrypha, in the mish-mash that is John's Revelation, I did not find those answers. I expected I never would fully know in this life what it all really meant.
It didn't matter, though, you see, if I didn't have a perfected personal belief system. Jesus had me from then on, functionally. I haven't been worthy of that rebirth, most of the subsequent decades, but in my worst sins, my darkest trials, my hardest moments, somehow, just remembering what he did and why, what he showed us we could be by enduring in faith, and his representation of the Father's love and promise of life, supplements my poor endurance and paucity of faith.
It's such a tough teaching, though, isn't it?
Love God as your Father.
Love all as your brothers and sisters.
Forgive.
Fear not.
Be of good cheer.
And that toughest one (for me), the basis of all the rest,
Have faith.
Still getting there, but grateful. Hally Loo Yeah.
He IS risen.
From last year, a mindful cartoon webwork:
Jerusalem Report
If they had TV and cells in 1st Century AD. Sort-of.
Eggshell Art
Vernal celebration tokens
Actual Easter eggshell art
Re-Commanded
I don't really have anything original to add to this conversation. I just wanted an excuse to run the picture above. [Source: Texas Tea Party Patriots]
Video and Transcript of Cruz's Announcement Speech c/o Dianny, Patriot Retort.
Now That Ted Cruz has Declared His Candidacy- You Ever Seen the Guy's Resume? (It's impressive.)
—Reaganite Republican
The Date Ted Cruz Announced His Presidential Campaign Is Significant And Here's Why
by Miss CJ, Chicks on the Right
Liberty University Crowd Goes Wild as Ted Cruz Says: Imagine A President Who Stands with Israel
Jim Hoft, Gateway Pundit [Videos]
Nice Cruz poster by Big Fur Hat over at I Own the World Report
DrewM is a downer at Ace of Spades; but there's always the comments: "But let's be honest, the odds of him winning the nomination are pretty low and he'd probably be a disaster in the general (though not much worse than Jeb will be)."
Barack Obama AND Ted Cruz are natural-born citizens
chrissythehyphenated on PoliNation
"…Their mothers were American citizens; their fathers (of record*) were foreigners.…"









