Dynamic Disaster

AllenG: Okay, let's take this apart:

That immediately had me rubbing my hands in glee. Oh good! Someone's tackling it!

AllenG: "It's fast, built in static HTML"
Dude, no one has used static HTML for years FOR A REASON.

^ This is why I'm chiming in.

It might be as long as five years ago now that my son came to me about using a website management system.

It took us much time to learn the ropes, much time more to covert the majority of my sad old static vanity website's content (slogan: "the Web's best-kept secret since 1996"). (BTW, having started some sites from scratch, I can testify it's lots harder to convert from static, hoo boy!)

I just am glad I was able to convert in time to be laughing with Allen about this.

On the other hand, I'm thinking, these sites are probably all about as vulnerable as sites can be. Not that I'm suggesting anything; just saying.