Posts

Posts
All articles from all albums, full content, latest on top,
not including Doodles
Page 95 of 132, posts 471 - 475 of 658
Urantiana

The timeline gets pushed back again... still a pretty big gap.

Artifacts upend theory on first North Americans
A cache of 15,500-year-old artifacts found buried in a Texas flood plain predates the well-known Clovis people, long thought to be the first inhabitants of the New World.
—Thomas H. Maugh II, Los Angeles Times

Click for larger image

Stone tools 'demand new American story'
A number of digs across the Americas in recent decades had already hinted that the "Clovis first" model was in serious trouble.

But the huge collection of well-dated tools excavated from a creek bed 60km (40 miles) northwest of Austin mean the theory is now dead, argue the Science authors.

"This is almost like a baseball bat to the side of the head of the archaeological community to wake up and say, 'hey, there are pre-Clovis people here, that we have to stop quibbling and we need to develop a new model for peopling of the Americas'," Michael Waters, a Texas A&M University anthropologist, told reporters.
—Paul Rincon and Jonathan Amos, BBC News

Dig solidifies evidence that first Americans were here 15,000 years ago
The newly unearthed objects come from a site northwest of Austin, which has been under excavation for several years along a waterway known as Buttermilk Creek. They consist of relatively crude scrapers, knife blades, broken and half-repaired spear points, and more than 15,000 flakes and chips testifying to human workmanship. They bear some similarity to Clovis tools, although not a clear one.

Whether the people who made them were related to the people who made the Clovis tools is uncertain. However, no bones or other DNA-containing materials were found, so the question can’t be answered.

“Cultural history and biological history do not have to go hand in hand. So there’s no way you can say they were related to each other,” said Eske Willerslev, director of the Center for GeoGenetics at the University of Copenhagen.
—David Brown, Washinton Post

People Were Chipping Stone Tools in Texas More Than 15,000 Years Ago
The area where the tools were found, northwest of Austin, must have been an appealing campsite for millennia, because it bears a record of nearly continuous occupation from 15,500 years ago. The discovery is detailed in a new study, published online March 24 in Science.

When the makers of these tools were using the site (from 15,500 to 13,200 years ago), the region would have been slightly cooler than it is today, probably by an average of about 5 to 6 degrees Celsius—"rather amiable at that time period," Lee Nordt, of Baylor University's Department of Geology and co-author of the new study, said in a press briefing on Wednesday. But the resources in the area were likely plentiful, added Michael Waters, of the Center for the Study of the First Americans at Texas A&M University in College Station and co-author of the new study. With the rich hill country around them, "it's not surprising people came back time and time again."

The people who left the tools and fragments described in the study were likely hunter–gatherers, passing through the site from time to time over thousands of years. "This was a mobile tool kit—something that was easily transported," Waters said.
Katherine Harmon, Scientific American

About eighty-five thousand years ago the comparatively pure remnants of the red race went en masse across to North America, and shortly thereafter the Bering land isthmus sank, thus isolating them.
—Urantia Paper 64, The Evolutionary Races of Color, §6. The Six Sangik Races of Urantia, ¶5 (pg 725)

Fifteen thousand, eighty-five thousand... still a pretty big gap. On the other hand, they apparently were pretty well-established deep in the heart of Texas by this point.




Radical Incline

We cannot by this presume that B Hussein or the Mrs actually partook of the suckling pig.

Obama

On HillBuzz, Buttered said:[*] "...There is not a single photo or White House menu of the Obamas eating, bacon, ham, or pork lion...." A Mindful Webworker replied[*] (edited to embed links and video).

"As with any VIPs or friends who dine at the Source, Drewno sent signature items to the Obamas’ table: tuna tartare cones, squares of suckling pig, tandoori Arctic char. The first couple make a point of having those items added to the bill." (Wash Post)[*] (Emphasis added.) Note: We cannot by this presume that B Hussein or the Mrs actually partook of the suckling pig.

Here's the first link[*] that turned up on Google Images for "Baby Pig" (a suggested link I noticed after looking through six pages of thumbnails of roast suckling pig). Warning, high "d'awww!" factor.

This has been Your Hog Report for the day.




Short & Tall Tales

They saw a sign directing them to "Heavener."

H sweater letter

A Mindful Webworker comments on Arlo and Janis.com in reply to: Mike in Missouri discussing place-name pronunciations, especially regarding Cairo, Illinois, "the old time rivermen call it KAY-ro (which the locals don’t like)"

Mike in Missouri, my Illinois-native wife must be an “old time riverman,” because she allus tol’ me it was KAY-ro, but at least I won’t spend a night in jail. Wasn’t Cairo, IL, the original “final home” before the locals helped the JW’s decide that Salt Lake City would be more hospitable?*

Over here in Oklahoma, you have Miami, which of course is My-AM-uh. ‘Nuff said.

Decades ago, a relative described driving his new furriner wife around south-eastern Oklahoma. They saw a sign directing them to “Heavener.” My religiously starry-eyed but geographically challenged relative exclaimed to his bride, Why! We’re “heaven-ers!” So they drove into town, asked a local how you pronounce the name of the town, and skee-daddled out of there when they heard him welcome them, of course, to “HEAVE-nurr”.

* No, that was Mormons, and it was Nauvoo, IL.



The Art of

Here's a Mary Worth alteration I indulged in when I should have been doing more important things today.

I've been enjoying the Comics Curmudgeon off and on for years, but more regularly lately. Here's a Mary Worth alteration I indulged in when I should have been doing more important things today.

After the Substitute Curmudgeon posted the Mary Worth cartoon for 2011 March 8 (click this link and scroll down the page a little), Curmudgeon Commenter Terryfic replied, noting (ahem!) some art problems. This led me to my version of the cartoon. (Original credits to the writer, artist, syndicate, their spouses and mothers.) Now, the second panel makes more sense in other ways, like how the girl went from happy to haggard due to her week of Dad's relentless hassling.

re-worked
Click to embiggen




The Art of

I don't care who won what awards, but this morning I couldn't resist hitting a link to the worst-dressed ladies at the Oscars...!

Worst Dressed Oscar

Mindful the Webworker comments on The HillBuzz Oscar Watch thread::

I come to HillBuzz for the politics, not for Boystown buzz. Yet here I am on the Oscar thread! Hunh!

Likewise I go to the blog of a great guy, writer Mark Evanier, for his many marvelous entertainment industry (especially animation and comics) insider tales and related links, and not so much for his unfortunate misguided liberal beliefs and links to the like.

Mark writes of the Oscars that he's "baffled by those who moan it's 3+ hours of rich, successful people stroking one another. Well, yeah. Those who have this complaint are unclear on the concept." HA!

Save for a very few of their actual products, I have a pretty much total disinterest in all Hollywood matters (other than Mark Evanier stories). Likewise I have only amused and distant interest in what's called fashion. I don't care who won what awards, but this morning I couldn't resist hitting a link to the worst-dressed ladies at the Oscars! Old "flannel-shirt blue-jeans straight guy no queer eye could help" as my tastes might be, even I am appalled by these fabric catastrophes. (One MORE good indication why one should never seriously consider the political opinions of most Hollywoodens.) I am practically FORCED to do that JackJack Benny "Well!" pose and simper, DARLING! WHO let you out of the house in THAT?




Pages