Just to Advocate Diabolically

Upbreeding corn for juicier, sweeter, disease resistace, bigger, poppier (?), etc., over generations, versus splicing corn DNA with some bits of virus or lamb DNA, to exaggerate for the sake of emphasis and humor: That there may be significant difference between these is an unwarranted concern?

Might introducing what is basically an entirely new food into a large population in one generation cause far worse allergic reactions or digestive difficulties or who knows what else, than naturally-upbred foods to which populations adapted over generations?

Shouldn't conservatives consider that this rapid introduction of laboratory chimeras is Big Ag making the general population their guinea pigs? again?

Theoretically. So I've heard. Just to advocate diabolically.

Mmmm. Corrnnnnn.